What to expect with active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer?

I was recently diagnosed with low-risk, Stage I prostate cancer and learning about my treatment options. My doctor explained that I have several good choices, including active surveillance, which means closely monitoring the cancer with regular tests and check-ups, or more active treatments like surgery or radiation therapy right away. I'm told that many people with low-risk prostate cancer like mine can safely start with active surveillance to avoid treatment side effects, with other treatments still available if things change. I'd love to hear from others who've been in a similar situation. • If you chose active surveillance, what has your experience been like with the regular monitoring? • What factors helped you decide between active surveillance and immediate treatment?