What treatment did you choose for intermediate favorable-risk prostate cancer?

I was recently diagnosed with intermediate favorable-risk prostate cancer and learning about my treatment options. My doctor explained that I have several choices: active surveillance where they monitor the cancer closely with regular testing, radiation therapy that uses targeted energy beams, or surgery to remove the prostate. Each approach has different benefits and potential side effects - like how active surveillance avoids treatment side effects but needs ongoing monitoring, while surgery and radiation aim to eliminate the cancer but might affect urinary or sexual function. I'd love to hear from others who've faced similar decisions and learn from your experiences. • If you had intermediate favorable-risk prostate cancer, how did you decide between these treatment options? • What do you wish you had known when weighing active surveillance versus active treatment?