What factors helped you decide between active surveillance vs treatment for low-...

I was recently diagnosed with low-risk, Stage I prostate cancer and I'm trying to understand my treatment options. My doctor explained that I have choices ranging from active surveillance (regular monitoring without immediate treatment) to active treatments like surgery or radiation therapy. Active surveillance means watching the cancer closely with regular check-ups and tests, while the other options aim to remove or destroy the cancer right away. Each approach has different benefits and side effects that I'm still learning about. I'd love to hear from others who have been in a similar situation and can share their experiences. • If you had low-risk prostate cancer, what factors helped you decide between active surveillance and active treatment? • What do you wish you had known when making this decision?